Who Wants to be a Surgeon? A Survey of Medical Students at the University of Nairobi, Kenya
Mwachaka P.M. BSc, Mbugua E. BSc Saidi H. Bsc, MbChB, MMed, FACS, Affiliation: School of Medicine, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
Dr. Philip Maseghe Mwachaka, P.O Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Email: email@example.com
Background: In Sub Saharan Africa, surgical conditions account for a significant disease burden. Surgical workforce is however inadequate, and thus strategies such as attracting medical students to surgical specialties could avert the situation. This study determined the proportion of students interested in pursuing surgical career and factors that influence choice of this specialty.
Methodology: Four hundred and fifty medical students, from first to fifth year of study at the University of Nairobi, were each issued a self administered questionnaire designed to assess their specialty preferences, and factors influencing these choices.
Results: The response rate was 385/450(85.6%). Surgery was the most popular specialty with 105(27.3%) students. Majority, 60(57%), of those who preferred surgery were in the preclinical years. Male students had a two-fold likelihood of selecting a surgical career compared to females. Significant factors that attracted students to surgery instead of non surgical careers were prestige of the specialty (p<0.001), presence of a role model (p=0.002), and intellectual challenge (p=0.005). Main deterring factors were ease of raising a family (p<0.001), length of residency (p<0.001) and lifestyle of practice (p=0.020).
Conclusion: Although surgery is the most preferred specialty among medical students at the University of Nairobi, there appears to be a declining interest among the clinical students. In order to attract and maintain student interest in the specialty, there is need for early and active mentoring.
In Sub Saharan Africa, a significant proportion of disease burden is associated with surgical conditions (1,2). The estimate of 38 DALYs (disability adjusted life years) lost per one thousand people in Sub Saharan Africa due to surgical conditions is the highest compared to other regions of the world (2,3). The main cause of this burden is inadequate surgical work force (3). Africa has 24% of the global health burden but only 3% of the global health workforce whereas United States of America has 10% of the global health burden and 37% of the global health work force (3). Improving the recruitment of surgical trainees, through encouraging more medical students to pursue surgical careers, may help alleviate this shortage (4-6).
Undergraduate medical education has largely been ignored in Africa. There is paucity of published data on medical student career preferences, as opposed to Western countries here data on career trends can readily be accessed (7,8). In these countries, where declining student interest in surgical careers have been observed, active and early mentoring has been widely promoted as an important avenue for addressing the trend (7-9). Understanding medical students’ career preferences and the factors influencing these choices helps surgical educators devise strategies aimed at attracting and maintaining student interest in surgical careers (5-9). Our study, aimed at determining medical student’s interest in surgery at the University of Nairobi, Kenya, and the factors influencing choice of this specialty.
Materials and Methods
Setting and participants: This study enrolled medical students at the University of Nairobi in Kenya, which runs a five year undergraduate degree program in medicine. In this study, students in all five years of study were enrolled. The survey was conducted between September and October 2009, coinciding with the last quarter of the 2008/09 academic year. In the 2008/09 academic year, there were 1557(874 male and 683 female) students. For this study we enrolled 450 students, ninety per year of study. All participants were informed of the aim of the study and that their involvement was voluntary.
Procedure and Measures: Self administered questionnaires (printed) were disseminated and collected in classrooms for 1st to 5th year students. The survey took approximately 10 minutes to complete. Information collected included: gender, marital status, year of study, their preferred specialty, factors that influenced the choice, and timing of specialty choice. The participants were offered the following list of possible specialties: surgery, internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, public health, psychiatry, radiology, anesthesiology, pathology, microbiology, anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, ophthalmology, immunology and other (a write in option).
Option for ‘not yet decided’ was also included. These specialties were preselected as it was felt they would be clear and distinct for most students. The participants were allowed to choose only one specialty. Regarding the factors influencing choice of the specialties, the students responded to the question “Did this factor influence your choice of the specialty?” The response was either ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to a list that included: encouragement by teaching or clinical staff, role model in the specialty, job opportunities and financial rewards, prestige of the specialty, academic and research opportunities, intellectual challenge in the specialty, lifestyle of practice, gender distribution in the specialty, ease of raising up a family, ease of entry into residency, length of residency, lifestyle during residency, and further training required after residency. These factors were based on similar published studies (6-9).
Analysis: Data collected were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 17.0. Chi square test was used to evaluate gender differences as well compare those who chose surgery to those who chose other careers. In cases where the expected value of any cell was less than 5, the two-tailed Fisher’s exact test was performed. A p-value≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Of the 450 questionnaires administered, 385 (85.6%) were returned. Male respondents were 217 (56.4%). The response according to year of study is summarized in Table 1. Only 58 (15.1%) students had not yet decided on their future careers.
Choice of surgery
Surgery was the most preferred specialty (27.3%)(Figure 1). It was the most popular specialty among male students 76(35%), and the second most preferred choice among the female students 29(17.3%).Majority, 60(57%), of those who preferred surgery were in the preclinical years, before surgery clerkship rotation (Figure 2).
Timing of specialty choice
Most students, 60 out of 105(57.1%), made their surgical career choice before joining medical school. Among those who were in the clinical years (third to fifth year), 19(42.2%) students considered this choice after their clerkship rotation in surgery. Figure 3 illustrates timing of choice of a surgical career according to year of study.
Factors influencing choice of surgery
Table 2 summarizes the factors influencing choice of surgery. The main determining factors were presence of role models 83(79%), intellectual challenge in the specialty 82(78.1%), prestige of specialty 75(71.4%), and availability of academic and research opportunities 75(71.4%). Factors that exerted minimal influence included length of residency 18(17.1%) and easy of entry into residency programmes 13(12.4%). Significantly more females than males considered gender distribution in the specialty (p<0.001). More preclinical students selected surgery because of availability of academic and research opportunities in the specialty (p=0.025).The other factors studied did not exhibit statistically significant between males and females or between preclinical and clinical students differences.
Choice of surgery versus choice of other careers
Table 3 compares the factors influencing choice of surgery versus other careers. Significant factors that positively influenced the choice of surgery included prestige of the specialty (p<0.001), presence of a role model in the specialty (p=0.002) and intellectual challenge of the specialty (p=0.005). Factors that negatively influenced choice of surgery consisted of ability of raising a family (p<0.001), length of residency training (p<0.001) and lifestyle of practice (p=0.020). In addition to the above mentioned factors, female students choosing surgery significantly considered gender distribution in the specialty than their colleagues who preferred other specialties (p=0.002).
Career choice decision making process among medical students has been a focus of many investigators. The current study reveals that surgery is the most popular specialty among medical students in Kenya, and that more male than female students are attracted to a surgical career. This concurs with findings by other workers (5-9). The pattern of low application rates by women to surgical specialties is shaped by multiple factors, which include a lack of female role models and mentors (10), and perceived gender-based discrimination (11,12). Recently, particular attention has been given to the notion of students rejecting surgical careers because they do not offer a “controllable lifestyle” (13-15). Studies have reported that women were more likely than men to expect an interruption in their careers in order to raise children (15-19). In tandem with these studies are our findings that women significantly considered lifestyle of practice, ability to raise children, and length of residency.
The impact of role models in career choice among medical students cannot be overemphasized. In the current study, 79% of students who chose surgery were encouraged by role models. Exposure to role models during medical school is strongly associated with a medical student’s choice of clinical field for residency training (19). Medical students encouraged by role models to pursue a surgical career are less likely to be discouraged by lifestyle, time commitment, call schedules, or length of residency (6,19). This study further reinforces the relevance of role modeling in encouraging medical students to consider surgical careers. We however found that less than half of the students were encouraged by teaching or clinical staff. This raises the question: where are the role models? Although our study did not explore this, the students may have been influenced by role models who are not necessarily part of medical school faculty.
Students consider the level of prestige they believe a specialty has when choosing a career, and surgery is frequently ranked as the highest in status (8,9). Prestige is captured as respect for surgeons by patients and other physicians (8,9,20). In the current survey, both male and female students who selected surgery as a career significantly considered this prestige. Reports by other authors have reported that students who value prestige of their future profession are five times more likely to choose surgery or a surgical specialty over a primary care specialty (21). Social prestige appears to increase in importance among medical students after brief interaction with surgery faculty (22).
Studies examining timing of career choices among medical students have suggested that career interests formed before entry into medical school may be predictive of eventual career choices (10,23,24). In the current study 57.1% of students who had selected surgery had interest in this career even before entry into medical school. Other studies have also reported that a student’s desire to practice surgery was largely determined before entry into medical school and that students who expressed interest in nonsurgical careers were less likely to have their areas of specialty solidified to the same extent at that time (10,22). Clerkship rotations in surgery have also been reported to influence specialty choice, especially through exposure to surgical procedures and mentorship (25,26). In our study 42.2% of the clinical students who selected surgery developed interest in the specialty after clerkship rotation. Thus a positive surgical clerkship experience is crucial in attracting students to the specialty. Our study revealed that most students interested in surgery are in the preclinical years and that there is reduced interest among clinical students. This thus implies that a high number of students entering medical school want a surgical career but along the way some are lost to other specialties. The only significant factor explaining why more preclinical students chose surgery was presence of research and academic positions. Indeed majority of the lecturers in preclinical years are surgeons. Some departments like Human Anatomy had more that 50% of the academic staff being surgeons (27). These teaching positions may have attracted the students to surgery. It is also possible that the clinical students who initially had desire to do surgery, may have developed interest in other specialties after clerkship in these specialties, or some factors in the medical school discouraged them from surgical careers.
Our study has the following limitations. Firstly we measured specialty preference at one point in time. It is known that specialty choice does not remain stable over the course of medical education, and students tend to use their clinical years as well as internship period to refine their specialty preferences (28). Secondly, structured questionnaires may not have captured some of the subtleties of views about career choices and a more open-ended interview format might be more suitable in capturing the essence of what the respondents thought about the specialty. This study however serves as a pilot for future, more comprehensive cohort studies following up the students from the early years in medical school to the actual time they choose the specialties.
Although surgery is the most preferred specialty among medical students at the University of Nairobi, there appears to be a declining interest among the clinical students. Role models and social perceptions of surgeons are the main attractants while lifestyle considerations deter students from selecting surgical careers. In order to attract and maintain student interest in the specialty, there is need for early and active mentoring of the students as well as address the factors that discourage students from surgery.
Ozgediz D, Jamison D, Cherian M, et al. The burden of surgical conditions and access to surgical care in low- and middle-income countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2008, 86 (8): 646-647.
Ozgediz D, Riviello R. The “Other” neglected diseases in global public health: Surgical conditions in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLOS Medicine. 2008, 5(6):850-854.
Luboga S , Macfarlane S, von Schreeb J, et al. Increasing access to surgical services in Sub-Saharan Africa: Priorities for national and international agencies Recommended by the Bellagio Essential Surgery Group. PLOS Medicine. 2009, 6(12):1-5.
Galukande M, Kijjambu S, Luboga S Improving recruitment of surgical trainees and training of surgeons in Uganda. East Cent Afr J Surg. 2006 11: 17-24.
Azizzadeh A, McCollum CH, Miller CC III, et al. Factors influencing career choice among medical students interested in surgery. Curr Surg 2003; 60:210-3.
Erzurum VZ, Obermeyer RJ, Fecher A, et al. What influences medical students’ choice of surgical careers. Surgery 2000; 128:253– 6.
Lambert EM, Holmboe ES. The relationship between specialty choice and gender of U.S. medical students, 1990-2003. Acad Med 2005; 80:797-802.
Dorsey ER, Jarjoura D, Rutecki GW. The influence of controllable lifestyle and sex on the specialty choices of graduating U.S. medical students, 1996–2003. Acad Med 2005; 80:791796.
Wendel TM, Godellas CV, Prinz RA. Are there gender differences in choosing a surgical career? Surgery 2003; 134:591-6.
Mayer KL, Perez RV, Ho HS. Factors affecting choice of surgical residency training program. J Surg Res 2001; 98:71–5.
Lillemoe KD, Ahrendt GM, Yeo CJ, et al. Surgery—still an “old boys’ club”? Surgery 1994; 116:255–9.
Richardson HC, Redfern N. Why do women reject surgical careers? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000; 82(Suppl):290–3.
Gordin R, Jacobsen SJ, Rimm AA. Similarities in the personalities of women and men who were first year medical students planning careers as surgeons. Acad Med 1991; 66:560.
Baxter N, Cohen R, McLeod R. Impact of gender on the choice of surgery as a career. Am J Surg 1996; 172:373–6.
Richardson JD. Workforce and lifestyle issues in general surgery training and practice. Arch Surg 2002; 137:515–20.
Gelfand DV, Podnos YD, Wilson SE,et al. Choosing general surgery: insights into career choices of current medical students. Arch Surg 2002; 137:941–5.
Gargiulo DA, Hyman NH, Herbery JC. Women in surgery: Do we really understand the deterrents? Arch Surg 2006; 141:405-7
Park J, Minor S, Taylor RA, et al. Why are women deterred from general surgery training? Am J Surg 2005; 190:141-6.
Cochran A, Paukert JL, Scales EM, et al. How medical students define surgical mentors. Am J Surg 2004;187:698–701
Barshes NR, Vavra AK, Miller A, et al. General Surgery as a Career: A Contemporary review of factors central to medical student specialty choice. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199(5): 792799.
Kiker BF, Zeh M. Relative income expectations, expected mal-practice premium costs, and other determinants of physician specialty choice. J Health Soc Behav 1998; 39:152–167.
Kozar RA, Lucci A, Miller CC, et al. Brief intervention by surgeons can influence students toward a career in surgery. J Surg Res 2003; 111:166–169.
Carline JD, Greer T. Comparing physicians’ specialty interests upon entering medical school with their eventual practice specialties. Acad Med 1991; 66:44-6.
Zeldow PB, Preston RC, Daugherty SR. The decision to enter a medical specialty: timing and stability. Med Educ 1992; 26: 327-32.
Chen H, Hardacre JM, Martin C, et al. Do medical school surgical rotations influence subspecialty choice? J Surg Res2001; 97:172–178.
Cochran A, Paukert JL, Neumayer LA. Does a general surgery clerkship influence student perceptions of surgeons and surgical careers? Surgery 2003; 134:153–157.
University of Nairobi. School of Medicine: Staff profile. www.uonbi.ac.ke.
Scott I, Gowans MC, Wright B, et al. Why medical students switch careers. Changing course during the preclinical years of medical school. Can Fam Physician 2007;53:94-95