Acute pancreatitis at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi: a two year audit

Author Information

M. Mutebi, MBChB, A. Abdallah, MBChB, FRCS, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital,
Nairobi, P.O. Box 30270- 00100, Nairobi, Kenya and H. Saidi, BSc., MBChB, MMed, FCS, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital and Department of Human Anatomy, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya

Corresponding author:

Dr. M. Mutebi, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, P.O. Box 30270- 00100, Nairobi, Kenya,   

Email:

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis ranges in severity from a mild, self-limiting to a fulminant disease with systemic decompensation. The treatment of the severe form of the disease may be difficult with mortality rates of up to 30%. There are published, evidence-based guidelines for optimizing outcome of the disease (1,2). We performed this audit to determine whether our clinical practice conformed to these guidelines.

AIM: To audit the management of patients admitted with acute pancreatitis at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) and compare the current practice with accepted international guidelines (1,2) with respect to diagnostic modalities, severity stratification, critical care unit (CCU) management for severe disease, timing of treatment intervention strategies and mortality.

DESIGN: Retrospective audit of hospital records.

METHODS: The medical records of all patients admitted to the AKUH with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis from 1st January 2005 to 31st January 2007 were reviewed.

RESULTS: Thirty five patients were admitted with a confirmed diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in the two year period. Twenty six patients were males (74%). The median age was 46 years (range 29-82 years). The aetiology of the acute pancreatitis was alcohol in 51%, gallstones in 11%, other causes in 9% and idiopathic in 29% of patients. The median length of hospital stay was 11 days (range 1–38). The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was confirmed by amylase and lipase assays or with CT scan evidence of pancreatitis. Only three patients (8%) had formal severity stratification (Ranson’s score). Eight patients (23%) had severe disease as defined by pancreatic necrosis and need for critical care. Twenty seven patients with mild disease also underwent abdominal CT scans and only 54% of all patients had an initial ultrasound to exclude gallstones. The timing of these investigations was arbitrary. Ten patients with mild disease received unnecessary prophylactic antibiotics including metronidazole, cefuroxime, and tazobactam/ piperacillin for a median period of 7 days. In severe disease where antibiotic use is possibly justifiable, a carbapenem based antibiotic was prescribed for four patients. Nasojejunal feeding was instituted early in six patients with severe disease and parenteral nutrition was also used exclusively in one patient. The overall mortality was 2.9% with the only death occurring in the severe subgroup thereby making the mortality rate in those patients with severe acute pancreatitis in this audit 12.5%.

CONCLUSIONS: The current management of acute pancreatitis at AKUH is physician dependant and not in conformity with the established and recommended guidelines. The CT scans were over-prescribed, their timing inappropriate and efforts to exclude the cause of pancreatitis moderate. The mortality rate is acceptable by international standards despite uniform application of diagnostic and risk stratification tools.

Introduction

 

Pancreatitis was first characterised by Lord Monihyan in 1925, as the ‘most terrible of calamities to affect the viscera’ and its attendant mortality as, ‘the most formidable of catastrophes’ (3). Despite considerable evolution in its management, acute pancreatitis continues to present therapeutic challenges due to its variable clinical presentation and natural history, ranging from mild innocuous self-limiting disease to frank necrosis of the gland and multiple organ failure (4). Markers of severe disease as defined by the Atlanta symposium include a Ranson’s score >3, Apache score of >8 or presence of one or more organ failures or local complications. The overall mortality in hospitalised patients is approximately 10%, but may increase to 30% in those with severe disease (5). A multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) usually presents within days of the severe form of the disease with secondary complications and further clinical deterioration due to infected necrosis and systemic sepsis developing in the second week.

Institution of prompt intensive care has decreased the morbidity (6) over the years and improved the overall quality of life in survivors of severe disease (7). Early recognition of patients at risk for severe disease using any of a variety of risk stratification methods (Ranson’s, Modified Glasgow and Apache II scores) has also modified outcomes (2) by dictating the pace and setting of care. Several evidence-based guidelines (British, International Association of Pancreatology, Japanese etc.) have been designed to provide recommendations for managing acute pancreatitis. These guidelines include methods for early diagnosis, critical care management for severe acute pancreatitis and the timing of radiological investigations and surgical interventions. The concordance of clinical practice with the guidelines for therapy is however variable. Even if they know the current recommended guidelines, clinicians do not always follow these recommendations (12). This audit compares the management of acute pancreatitis at the AKUH with these recommended international guidelines.

Methods

The medical records of all patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis between 1st January 2005 and 31st January 2007 were reviewed. All patients presented with epigastric pain. Patients who had a presumptive diagnosis of pancreatitis, who subsequently had an alternative definitive diagnosis made (gastritis or peptic ulcer disease (PUD) confirmed on endoscopy), were excluded from this audit.

The points audited were as follows:

  • Method of diagnosis/diagnostic modality

  • Risk stratification of patients

  • Management practice

  • Other therapeutic measures such as early enteral feeding and antibiotic usage

  • Overall mortality

The aetiology of acute pancreatitis was classified as gallstones (demonstrated by ultrasound), alcohol (when average daily intake exceeded 50g in the absence of other causes), other causes e.g. secondary to anti-retroviral use, post ERCP or as idiopathic (when no cause could be readily identified). Records were obtained on the mode of diagnosis, the