Omentoplasty in Perforated Peptic Ulcer Surgery:Is it Still the Gold Standard?

 

Paul Ochieng‟ Odula

School of Medicine, University of Nairobi

Correspondence to: Dr. Paul Odula, P.O. Box 19762 – 00202, Nairobi, Kenya. Email: paulodula@yahoo.com

Key words: Omentoplasty, Perforated peptic ulcer

Ann Afr Surg. 2017; 14(2):57-60

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/aas.v14i2.1

 

© 2017 Author. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Acute peptic ulcer perforation is the commonest cause of emergency hospitalization and accounts for more than 70% of deaths associated with peptic ulcer disease (PUD) (1). This perforation is located either in the stomach or the anterior surface of the duodenum (2). The pattern of perforated PUD varies from one geographical area to another (3). In their article, in this issue, Bekele et al reported that duodenal perforations were more common than gastric perforations in Ethiopia. They further reported that, peptic ulcer perforations (PPU) were more common in the youth (mean age of 33.4 years). In Nigeria, Dongo et al reported that the converse to be true (4). They found that PPU were more commonly seen in gastric ulcers and often affected an older population (mean age of 49.99 years (4).

 

The first clinical description of a perforated peptic ulcer was on an autopsy done on the body of King Charles daughter, Henriette Anne, who died suddenly in 1670 (at 26 years of age)(5). John Mikulicz (1850 – 1905), often credited to be the first surgeon who closed a perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) by simple closure, said : “ Every doctor , faced with perforated duodenal ulcer of the stomach or intestine, must consider opening the abdomen, sewing up the hole and averting a possible inflammation by careful cleansing of the abdominal cavity”(6).

 

The narrative on this treatment over a century later has not changed much. It still consists of primary closure of the perforation by sutures and a convenient tag of adjacent omentum on top of this (7, 8). Although this may sound very simplistic, PPU still remains a life threatening condition with a high mortality of up to 40% which cannot be underestimated (9).

 

Several recent studies advocate non operative intervention as a stop gap before definitive surgical intervention (8). The disadvantages of this intervention are the high rate of mortality in case of the treatment failure and the lack of the benefit of laparoscopy or laparotomy as a diagnostic tool in case the patient has gastric cancer (10). Moreover, it is well known that, when the patient is in shock or when the time point between perforation and „start of treatment‟ is 12 hours, simple closure should be the first treatment of choice.

 

Surgery for PPU is still a subject of debate despite more than an era of publicized expertise. There are many operative methods that could be used to treat PPU. Cellan- Jones published an article in 1929 entitled „a rapid treatment in perforated duodenal ulcers‟ (11). At that time one had to excise the friable edges, when indicated, and then apply purse string sutures followed with an omental graft on top. Duodenal stenosis led to the popularization of omentoplasty which required omitting the purse string closure. This new technique consisted of placing 4-6 sutures, selecting a long omental strand and passing a fine suture through it. The tip of the strand would then be anchored in the region of perforation before the sutures are finally tied off (11).

 

It was not until 1937 that Graham published his results with a free omental graft (12). He placed three sutures with a piece of free omentum laid over these sutures, which were then tied. No attempt was made to actually close the perforation (13). The omental graft provided the stimulus for fibrin formation. Very often surgeons mention „using a Graham patch‟, but what they actually meant was ‘using a pedicled omental patch’ as described by Cellan-Jones. Perforated peptic ulcers are not the only ones which routinely benefit from omentoplasty in the abdomen. Marginal ulcer, an ulcer at the margins of the gastro-jejunal anastomosis, perforation which has traditionally been dealt with by converting Billroth II gastro-jejunostomy reconstruction into Roux-en-Y has seen some changes lately. Recent studies have shown that this revision is not mandatory anymore and that omental patch repair has increasingly been shown to be sufficient (14).Furthermore, numerous studies done in the past 4 decades have shown that, general surgeons are not the only ones who utilize the omental patch. The omental pedicle flap has also been widely used by neurosurgeons, thoracic surgeons and in the plastic and reconstructive arena (15-18). In this issue, Wamalwa et al highlights the challenges they went through in managing a difficult pulmonary tuberculosis sequel and how the omental pedicle played a key role in bringing the bronchopleural fistula under control (19).

 

The key features, as described by Wamalwa et al, that promote the use of the omental pedicle flap include:

  1. It being malleable and easily conforming to irregular surfaces.

  2. It has a large caliber and reliable vascular pedicle based on either right or left gastroepiploic artery.

  3. It can be easily harvested with minimal donor site morbidity.

  4. It has a good surface area which can measure up to 25x35 centimeters (15).

  5. It stimulates angiogenesis and revascularization (16, 20).

  6. With its high absorptive capacity, it is able to relieve lymphedema (17).

  7. Its immunoregulatory properties allow it to contain infection well (18).

 

The number of elective procedures performed for PUD has declined by more than 70% since the 1980’s (21, 22). Reasons for the decline in definitive ulcer surgery include:

  1. Lower recurrence rate of PUD and PPU because of good results of eradication

  2. Elimination of NSAID use.

 

Chung et al noted that less than 10% of PPU patients required gastric resection. In a study of 601 patients and including 62 patients treated with gastric resection, they noted that outcomes of patients treated with gastric resection were found to be more inferior when compared to omental patch repair with mortality risk of 24.2% (8). Some of the reasons for this outcome may include:

  1. In the past two decades, patients operated for PPU are much older with higher surgical risks. Hence definitive ulcer surgery would give a worse outcome than omental patch repair.

  2. Many surgeons practicing today have limited experience with definitive ulcer operations (21).

 

Patients in whom definitive ulcer surgery should be considered are those with PPU who are found to be H. Pylori negative or those with recurrent ulcers despite triple therapy (21). In these patients, a parietal cell vagotomy is recommended if necessary combined with anterior linear gastrectomy (21). This procedure can be safely and relatively easily performed laparoscopically in many centres now (21, 22).

 

Self-expandable metals stents and drainage is one of the new treatment options for PPU which can be used primarily or secondarily to deal with post operative leakage after initial surgical closure. A study involving 10 patients with PPU who were treated with primary stenting showed good clinical results (23). This study indicated stent treatment as a minimal invasive alternative with fewer complications compared to surgical treatment. More data however, is required to prove the effectiveness of this method.

 

Laparoscopy was first performed for a perforated duodenal ulcer in 1990 (24). A recent systematic review of 3 randomized controlled trials, having a total of 315 PPU patients, compared laparoscopy with open surgery (25). This study failed to demonstrate differences in abdominal septic complications, pulmonary complications, mortality and re-operation. A systematic review of 56 studies, comparing laparoscopic versus open approach for PPU, concluded that ‘there was no consensus on the perfect operating techniques’ (26). The overall conversation rate for laparoscopic surgery was 12.4% and this was mainly due to the size of perforation. Ulcer size more than 9mm was considered a significant risk factor for conversion to open surgery for PPU (26).

 

Laparoscopic repair techniques and in particular, sutureless technique, mirror techniques of open surgery. Sutureless techniques involve use of gelatin spo