ssk_logo.png

The Annals of African Surgery is the official publication of the Surgical Society of Kenya.

 

All content copyright © 2020 Annals of African Surgery.

ISSN (print): 1999-9674; ISSN (online): 2523-0816

Main Office Location: Menelik Medical Centre, Menelik Road, off Ngong Road, Nairobi. First floor.

Telephone: +254715260499

Email: info@annalsofafricansurgery.com.

 

The content on this site is intended for health professionals. Advertisements on this site do not constitute a guarantee or endorsement by the journal, Association, or publisher of the quality or value of such product or of the claims made for it by its manufacturer.

70.png
69.jpg
hinari_header_en.png

Objective Structured Clinical Examination Test: Comparison with Traditional Clinical Examinations

Ojuka Daniel, Nyaim Elly, Kiptoon Dan, Ndaguatha Peter

​Department of Surgery, University of Nairobi

Correspondence to: Dr. Ojuka Daniel, P.O Box 30197-00100, Nairobi. Email: danielojuka@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: Examination methods change over time, and audits are useful for quality assurance and improvement. Objective: Comparison of traditional clinical tests and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) at the department of surgery. Methodology: Examination records of results of the fifth year MBChB examinations for 2012–2013 (traditional) and results for 2014–2015 OSCE were analysed. The pass rate for the clinical examinations in each year was calculated and these figures were subjected to the t-test to determine if there were significant differences between the 2 years and type of clinical test. P-value of <0.05 was used to determine significant statistical differences in the test score. Results: We analysed 1,178 results; OSCE had a slightly higher numberof students (55.6%). The average clinical scores examinations were 59.7% for traditional vs 60.1% for OSCE, with significant difference in means between OSCE and traditional examination (p =0.001). The stations that tested physical performance, such as physical examination and basic surgical skills, were positively skewed. Conclusion: OSCE in the same setting of teaching and examiners may award more marks than the traditional clinical examination, and is better at detecting areas of inadequacies to be emphasised in teaching.

Key words: Clinical examination, traditional, OSCE, comparison

Ann Afr Surg. 2020; 17(2):***

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/aas.v16i1.*

Conflicts of Interest: None

Funding: None

© 2020 Author. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook Social Icon
  • LinkedIn